How I helped Circus Street learners feel at home after a platform transition, without increasing support burden

MY ROLE ON THE PROJECT

I led product design from discovery to launch.

I worked closely with Product, Sales, Customer Success, Data, and Content stakeholders across three different organizations involved in the migration.

I was responsible for:

  • leading UX strategy

  • synthesizing research and usage data

  • identifying opportunities to simplify the experience

  • aligning competing stakeholder needs

  • designing and prototyping the end-to-end experience

One of the biggest challenges was organizational alignment.

The Course and Lesson pages had recently been redesigned, so most stakeholders initially expected a conservative refresh rather than structural changes. However, the data showed that several highly visible sections were barely used by learners, despite being considered important internally.

Rather than continuing to optimize around existing layouts, I pushed for a more fundamental rethink focused on reducing cognitive load and helping learners quickly find the information they actually needed.

Context

At the end of 2023, QA Group began migrating learners from Circus Street to the Cloud Academy platform.

This created a significant UX challenge. Circus Street learners were used to a simpler and more intuitive experience that they genuinely liked. Cloud Academy offered richer functionality, but also introduced additional complexity and denser content structures.

A slightly dramatized summary of how early user testing with Circus Street learners went.

There was a real risk that learners would:

Associate the migration with a degraded experience
Disengage during the transition
Generate increased support requests

Improving usability wasn’t just a UX goal — it was critical to reducing migration friction and protecting retention during a high-risk transition.

We decided to improve the experience incrementally, starting with the core learning flows: Courses and Lessons.

How might we help Circus Street learners adapt quickly to a more complex platform without overwhelming them or increasing churn risk?

To better understand the problem, I combined internal stakeholder feedback across three organizations, behavioral analytics and usability testing on the existing pages.

The research consistently pointed to the same issue: learners felt overwhelmed.

Both the Course and Lesson pages had cluttered layouts, unclear hierarchies, and low-value content in prominent positions. For instance, author link only had 0.2% user engagement but was taking up a good amount of space. Useful elements like the syllabus or description were partly hidden or hard to scan, while actions like enrolling or rating were inconsistently placed.

Misleading UI elements and structural inconsistencies (highlighted with a red dot in the image) made the experience feel disjointed. Most importantly, Circus Street stakeholders and learners described the pages as very overwhelming.

Associate the migration with a degraded experience
Disengage during the transition
Generate increased support requests
Associate the migration with a degraded experience
Disengage during the transition
Generate increased support requests

Our stakeholder priorities were often conflicting.

Different teams had strong opinions about what information needed to remain highly visible, even when usage data suggested learners rarely interacted with it.

Some examples:

  • author links had very low engagement but was very important for Cloud Academy content stakeholders and users

  • some metadata sections were almost never used but important for Sales

  • learners were scrolling extensively just to find course structure and progress information

However, removing less used sections entirely wasn’t possible because they served internal stakeholder goals across multiple organizations.

This forced us to think less about removal and more about prioritization.

Our stakeholder priorities were often conflicting.

I restructured the pages around learner priorities

Instead of continuing to layer improvements onto the existing structure, I redesigned the information hierarchy around the core learner tasks:

  • understanding course value quickly

  • finding course content faster

  • tracking progress easily

  • reducing distraction during learning

I restructured the pages around learner priorities

The redesign simplified scanning by prioritizing the most important information higher on the page and moving secondary content into dedicated tabs.

This allowed us to:

  • preserve stakeholder-required content

  • reduce cognitive overload

  • create a more scalable structure for future content needs

The redesign simplified scanning by prioritizing the most important information higher on the page and moving secondary content into dedicated tabs.

Designing for flexibility across multiple stakeholder needs

As briefly mention above, one of the most politically complex areas was instructor and author information.

Different organizations had different expectations:

  • some content rarely included author information

  • Cloud Academy content often relied on recognizable cloud experts

  • content teams wanted flexibility to support multiple contributors in the future

At the same time, learner engagement with author-related content was extremely low.

Rather than removing the section entirely, I proposed moving it into a dedicated “Credits” tab.

This created a compromise that:

  • reduced visual noise for learners

  • preserved stakeholder needs

  • supported future scalability

  • accommodated multiple content models

The system was intentionally designed to flex between:

  • no author information

  • a single author

  • multiple contributors

depending on the course type.

Clarifying progress and completion

User testing also showed that learners often missed completion states entirely.

Previously:

  • completed lessons only displayed a small “Complete” label

  • certificate information appeared early as an empty progress state

  • progress visibility lacked clarity

To improve this, I redesigned completion patterns by:

  • introducing clearer completion variants

  • allowing users to hide completed steps

  • delaying certificate visibility until content was fully completed

  • making achievement states more visually prominent

This made progress easier to understand while reducing unnecessary distractions earlier in the learning journey.

Outcome

The migration launched without a significant increase in learner complaints or support requests, which we considered a major success given the scale of the transition.

The redesign helped reduce friction during onboarding to a more complex platform while preserving access to stakeholder-required content.

We also saw behavioral signals that learners were finding key information faster:

Tab engagement remained below 20%, suggesting secondary information no longer distracted from primary tasks
Tab engagement remained below 20%, suggesting secondary information no longer distracted from primary tasks
Scroll depth decreased by 25%, indicating learners could access important content earlier without excessive scanning

Internally, content teams also responded positively to the clearer structure and increased flexibility of the new system.

Most importantly, the migration felt less like a disruption and more like a natural evolution of the learning experience.

Check out more projects

UI of AI assistant illustrating chat and and text selection

What an AI sales tool taught me about product adoption

Designed an AI tool to help sales reps create learning recommendations faster and reduce reliance on SMEs. Early adoption was promising, but over time the project revealed bigger challenges around trust, workflows, and product adoption.

Time from lead to first offer dropped

Significant reduction in SME involvement

Revealed how AI adoption depends on trust, existing workflows, and user behavior

UI of AI assistant illustrating chat and and text selection

How a panel redesign helped Sales and Customer Success teams avoid critical setup errors

I redesigned a complex admin tool used daily by Sales and Customer Success teams to configure enterprise client settings. The legacy system made critical errors easy. I rebuilt it around clarity, feedback, and safer workflows, reducing support needs and user stress.

Drop in support tickets tied to misconfiguration

New CSMs reporting higher confidence earlier

+34% Adoption Growth

UI of AI assistant illustrating chat and and text selection

How I've helped QA users learn more confidently with an AI assistant.

I led the end-to-end design of Ela, QA’s AI-powered learning assistant, transforming an inherited prototype into a trusted and scalable product in just two months. Designed to reduce friction and support learning momentum, Ela is now adopted by 80+ client accounts, holds a 4.5/5 satisfaction score, and has influenced the development of new AI capabilities across the platform.

4.5/5 Avg. Rating

1,178 Client Accounts

+34% Adoption Growth

Sidebar of an assignment displayed on top of a lesson

How I redesigned navigation to keep learners on track.

I designed a universal sidebar to unify all content types during a major content merger. Learners can now track their progress without leaving the lesson, reducing distractions.

53% drop in users exiting lessons to track progress

28% reduction in fullscreen toggling to study

Marathon's user dashboard and result page

How I gamified learning at Cloud Academy boosting user motivation and MoM cashflow.

I designed a 3-month challenge that increased engagement, reduced churn, and boosted cashflow. 20% of participants stayed active three months after—well beyond typical subscription periods.

+18% increase in MoM upfront cashflow

1,178 Client Accounts

+34% Adoption Growth